![Department of State Revises Guidelines for Consular Consideration of Requests for INA 212(d)(3)(a) Nonimmigrant Visa Waiver Relief](assets/images-t1723836819/200786.jpeg)
The Department of State revised its guidelines in Volume 9 of the Foreign Affairs Manual (FAM) instructing consular officers how to handle requests for waiver relief for certain inadmissible nonimmigrant visa applicants.
Prior to the recent revisions, 9 FAM 305.4-3 instructed consular officers considering whether or not to recommend waiver relief for such applicants to consider a number of factors, including the recency and seriousness of the conduct that led to the specific finding of inadmissibility for the applicant, the positive or negative impact on the public interest of the United States from allowing the individual to enter the United States with a waiver, the likelihood that the conduct would be repeated, and evidence of remorse and rehabilitation. These standards, reflected in the finding in Matter of Hranka (16 I&N Dec. 491 (BIA 1978) have guided consular officers in considering whether to favorably recommend waiver relief for almost 50 years.”
The revised guidelines in 9 FAM 305.4-3, which are in an explanatory note, provide consular adjudicators with a new standard to apply to determine whether allowing the applicant to enter the United States with a waiver would have a positive impact on the public interest of the United States—whether the applicant
“has graduated from with a degree from an institution of higher education in the United States, or has earned credentials to engage in skilled labor in the United States, and is seeking to travel to the United States to commence or continue employment with a United States. employer in a field related to the education that the applicant obtained in the United States.”
The new guidelines may offer immediate positive benefits to persons who may have accrued unlawful presence while in the United States, made misrepresentations in connection with seeking benefits under the Immigration & Nationality Act (INA), or may have a criminal offense leading to inadmissibility by adding another element that can be presented in favor of a waiver request for those who were educated in and/or are seeking lawful employment in the United States.
Two other changes to the 9 FAM 305.4-3 guidelines concerning waiver requests are noteworthy. First, under the previous guidelines, if a consular officer declined to recommend waiver relief the applicant could nonetheless ask that their request be submitted to the Department of State for review based on the “clear and significant government or public interest of the United States” of allowing the otherwise inadmissible applicant to enter the United States. In practice this has rarely been successful because the bar for determining whether a positive interest exists has been set very high. The newly revised guidelines in 9 FAM 305.4-3(E)(2)(a)(4) now expressly define “significant public interest” to include travel to the United States to take up or resume skilled employment with a United States employer. For such individuals, pressing for waiver relief in the absence of a favorable consular recommendation may well result in one. Consular officers, faced with the possibility that declining to recommend waiver relief in such instances could be overturned upon review in the Department, may now think twice before doing so.
Second, inadmissible applicants now have access to a new argument in support of a request to expedite waiver review. “Previously, consular officers who were asked to expedite new or pending waiver requests would only do so in cases “where there is clear and significant U.S. government or public interest (9 FAM 305.4-3(F)(a)).” This language has been changed to define travel to the United States to commence or continue skilled employment as being a clear and significant positive public interest.
It is worth noting that the language of the new FAM guidelines is unclear as to whether it will apply to applicants seeking employment in the United States who were not previously educated in the United States. While the first phrase notes that consuls may consider positively a waiver request from an inadmissible applicant who has attended a United States institution of higher education or (emphasis added) has earned credentials allowing them to perform skilled labor in the United States, the second part of the new language expressly refers to education “that the applicant obtained in the United States.” Exactly how the Department, through its individual consular officers, determines to apply these seemingly contradictory instructions remains to be seen. That said, the expansion of “positive public interest” to include United States educated individuals seeking to work legally in the United States should not only make the waiver process easier to navigate but also make it easier to expedite the process, reducing or even eliminating long processing delays that prevent such individuals from returning to or beginning work in the United States. As such, it is a significant and positive development.
- Special Counsel
Steve Pattison is nationally recognized in US immigration law, Department of State policy and procedures, and consular operations, and counsels clients on immigration and labor and employment law matters. Steve practiced ...
Search
Recent Posts
- September 2024 Visa Bulletin – Setbacks Continue; EB-3 Professionals (All Other Countries) Slides One Year
- Department of State Revises Guidelines for Consular Consideration of Requests for INA 212(d)(3)(a) Nonimmigrant Visa Waiver Relief
- History Repeats Itself: USCIS To Conduct Second Round of FY2025 H-1B Lottery
Categories
- Adjustment of Status
- Asylum
- Business Immigration
- CBP
- CIS
- Consular Processing
- Court Decisions
- COVID-19
- DED
- Deferred Action
- DHS
- DOL
- E-Verify
- EAD
- Enforcement
- F-1
- Federal Agencies
- Federal Laws/Legislation
- Global Immigration
- H-1B
- H-2B
- Homeland Security
- Humanitarian Relief
- I-9
- ICE
- Immigrant Visas
- L-1
- Labor Certification
- Legislation
- Naturalization
- News & Events
- Nonimmigrant Visas
- Other
- Processing Times
- REAL ID
- Refugees
- SSA
- State Department
- State Laws/Legislation
- TN
- TPS
- US Embassies
- USCIS
- Visa Lottery
- Visa Waiver Program
- Waivers
- Workplace Enforcement
Tags
- AC21
- ACA
- ACWIA
- Adam Rosser
- Adjustment of Status
- Adjustment of Status Applicant
- Adoption
- Advance Parole
- Agencies
- AILA
- Air Travel
- Application Service Centers
- Appropriations
- Arizona
- Asia
- Asylee
- Asylum
- Attorney General
- Awards
- B-1 Business Visitor
- B-1/B-2
- B-2 Tourist
- BALCA
- Biometrics
- Blanket L-1
- Board of Immigration Appeals
- Bob Quackenboss
- Brazil
- Brett Burns
- Brexit
- BRIDGE ACT
- Business Existence
- Business Immigration
- Business Immigration; USCIS; National Interest Waiver; labor certification
- Business Travel
- California
- Canada
- Cap
- Cap-Exempt
- Cap-Subject
- CARES Act
- CBP
- CDC
- Certification
- Chad
- Chaffetz
- Chambers USA
- Change In Location
- Change In Work Site
- Charities
- China
- Chris Pardo
- Citizenship
- Compliance
- Consular Processing
- Controlled Technology
- Coronavirus/COVID-19
- Court
- Covid test
- CPT
- Current Events
- Customer Identity Verification
- Customs and Border Protection
- DACA
- Decisions
- DED
- Deemed Export
- Deferred Action
- Deferred Inspection
- Department of Homeland Security
- Department of Justice
- Department of Labor
- Department of State
- DHS
- Diversity Visa
- Diversity Visa Lottery
- DOL
- DOMA
- Domestic Violence
- Donald Trump
- DOS
- DREAM Act
- Driver License
- DS-160
- DV Lottery
- DV-2019 Dates
- E visa
- E-1
- E-2
- E-2 investors
- E-2 Spouse
- E-2 Visas
- E-3
- E-3 Australians
- E-3 Spouse
- E-Verify
- E13
- E21
- EAD
- EADs
- EAR
- Earthquake
- EB-1
- EB-1 Backlog
- EB-2
- EB-3
- EB-5
- Ecuador
- El Salvador
- Electronic System for Travel Authorization
- Embassy
- Emily Burkhardt Vicente
- Employer
- Employment Authorization
- Employment Eligibility Verification
- Employment-Based Immigration
- ESTA
- ETIAS
- European Union
- eVerify
- Executive Order
- Executive Orders
- Exempt Employee
- Export
- Export License
- F-1
- Fairness for High Skilled Immigrants Act
- Family
- Family Relationships
- FAR
- Federal
- Federal Acquisitions Regulation
- Federal Contracts
- Federal Law
- Fees
- Filing Fees
- Fingerprints
- Fiscal Year 2016
- Foreign Grads
- Form 140
- Form I-9
- Form I-944
- Form Updates
- Fourth Circuit
- France
- Fraud Detection and National Security Directorate
- Full Vaccination
- Furlough
- FY15
- FY2017
- FY2020
- Georgia
- Global Entry
- Global Mobility
- Golden Arrow
- Grace Period
- Green Card
- Greg Robertson
- Guam
- Guinea
- H-1B
- H-1B Cap
- H-1B Registration
- H-1B Workers
- H-1B1
- H-2
- H-2B
- H-4
- H-4 EAD
- H-4 Spouse
- H-4 Spouses
- Haiti
- Hawaii
- Help HAITI Act
- HIV
- Holly Williamson
- Homeland Security
- Honduras
- HR 1044
- Humanitarian Relief
- Hunton Andrews Kurth
- I-129
- I-140
- I-20
- I-485
- I-539
- I-601A
- I-765
- I-9
- I-94
- I-94 Automation
- Ian Band
- ICE
- iCert
- Identification Document
- Immediate Relatives
- Immigrant
- Immigrant Investor Program
- Immigrant Visa
- Immigrant Visas
- Immigration
- Immigration & Customs Enforcement
- Immigration in Sports
- Immigration Uncertainty
- India
- Infopass
- International Offices
- Interns
- interview
- Interview Appointment
- Iran
- Iraq
- IRCA
- ITAR
- J-1
- Japan
- Josefina Augusto
- Juan Enjamio
- Kurt Larkin
- Kurt Powell
- L Visa
- L-1
- L-1 Intracompany Transferees
- L-1B
- L-2
- L-2 Spouse
- Labor
- Labor Certification
- Labor Market Test
- LCA
- Legal 500
- Legal Resident Aliens
- Legislation
- Liberia
- Liberian Nationals
- Libya
- License
- Limited Vaccine Availability
- Litigation
- Liya Green
- Lottery
- LPR
- M-1
- M-274
- M. Brett Burns
- Maryland
- Matter of A-B-
- Medical Exams
- Mexico
- Multinational Manager
- N-400
- NAFTA
- National Interest Exception
- National Interest Waiver
- National Labor Relations Board
- National Law Journal
- National Prevailing Wage Center
- National Visa Center
- Naturalization
- Natz
- Nepal
- New York
- NEXUS
- Nicaragua
- Nicaraqua
- Ninth Circuit
- NIV
- NLRB
- No-Match
- Nonimmigrant
- Nonimmigrant Visas
- Nonresident Alien
- North Korea
- Northern Mariana Islands
- NTA
- NVC
- O visa
- O-1
- Office Closures
- OPT
- Oregon
- P-1
- Passport
- Pérez v. Pérez
- PERM
- Permanent Residents
- Policy
- Portability
- Practical Training
- Preclearance
- Preflight Inspection
- Premium Processing
- Prescreening
- Presidential Proclamation
- Prevailing Wage Request
- Priority Date
- Pro Bono
- Processing Times
- Prohibited Entry
- Prosecutorial Discretion
- Provisional Waivers
- Public Access Files
- Public Charge
- REAL ID
- Reciprocity
- Recovery Rebate
- Reducing Salary
- Refugee
- Refugees
- Registry
- RFE
- Rugby
- Ryan Glasgow
- Safe-Harbor
- Same-Sex
- Satisfactory Departure
- SAVE Jobs USA
- Scott Nelson
- SCOTUS
- Section 1
- Selective Service
- SENTRI
- Sessions
- Shaena Rowland
- Sierra Leone
- Social Media
- Somalia
- South Sudan
- Special Events
- State Department
- State Law
- Stateside Waivers
- STEM OPT
- Stepchildren
- Stephen Pattison
- Sudan
- Supreme Court
- Syria
- Tax Credit
- Temporary Visas
- Terence Connor
- Texas
- TN
- TN visa
- TPS
- Tracker 8
- Trailblazer
- Trainees
- Transit Without a Visa
- Travel
- Travel Ban
- Travel Restrictions
- Trusted Traveler
- Tsunami
- U Visa
- U.S. Customs & Border Protection
- U.S. Department of State
- U.S. Embassies
- Ukraine
- UN
- Unemployment
- Unemployment Benefits
- Unfair Labor Practices
- Unlawful Presence
- US Citizenship and Immigration Services
- US Department of State
- US Embassy
- US passports
- US Travel Ban
- USCBP
- USCIS
- USD140
- USD150
- USD390
- Vaccine Passport
- Venezuela
- VIBE
- Visa
- Visa Bulletin
- Visa Control
- Visa Lottery
- Visa Revalidation
- Visa stamp
- Visa Waiver
- Visa Waiver Program
- Visas
- VWP
- Wait Times
- Waivers
- Whistleblower
- WHO
- Windsor v. United States
- Work Authorization
- Work Permits
- Work Search
- Worksite Enforcement
- Worksite Inspection
- World Health Organization
- Yemen
- “Buy American Hire American”