On June 11, 2021, the Belgian Data Protection Authority (“Belgian DPA”) released its 2020 Annual Report (the “Report”). Notably in 2020, the Belgian DPA focused on the supervision of initiatives to fight the COVID-19 pandemic involving data processing, while not losing sight of its other priorities, as identified in its Strategic Plan 2020-2025.
Due to the increased awareness of the importance of the protection of personal data, 2020 had a significant increase in the number of complaints, which were up 290.64%, and data breach notifications, which were up 25.09%, received by the Belgian DPA.
The Biggest Privacy Challenge: COVID-19
2020 was marked by an unprecedented health crisis that had a significant impact on data protection and the work of the Belgian DPA:
- The Belgian DPA created a dedicated COVID-19 page on its website (in Dutch and French), which is regularly updated with new guidelines and frequently asked questions for citizens and organizations alike.
- The Belgian DPA issued opinions on the collection, recording and use of health data in the context of contact tracing, vaccination, monitoring compliance with respect to testing and quarantines, a mobility index considered by the Government and the COVID-19 app (“Coronalert”).
- The Belgian DPA also addressed numerous initiatives, such as conducting temperature checks at Brussels Airport and a municipal initiative to require COVID-19 tests. Several COVID-19-related files were opened and currently are being examined by the Inspection Service or the Litigation Chamber of the Belgian DPA.
- The Litigation Chamber published its first COVID-19 decision specifically related to the use of cameras on the Belgian coast to monitor tourism (available in French or Dutch).
Major Themes in 2020
In addition to the work done in the context of the COVID-19 health crisis, the Belgian DPA continued working on its 2020-2025 priorities:
- Direct Marketing: The Belgian DPA published a comprehensive recommendation on the processing of personal data for direct marketing purposes.
- Online Privacy: The Belgian DPA launched a large-scale “pilot” investigation on the use of cookies by several popular Belgian media websites. The largest fine ever levied by the Belgian DPA (i.e., EUR 600,000) was imposed on Google Belgium for failing to respect a citizen’s right to be forgotten (this decision is currently under appeal).
- Awareness: The Belgian DPA worked on various initiatives and developed various tools for children and young people (i.e., www.jedecide.be), as well as for data protection officers (“DPOs”) and small and medium enterprises (“SMEs”). It also has redesigned its website and reworked the communication of its First Line Service, which is in direct contact with citizens and data controllers.
- DPO: A toolbox was set up to assist and coach DPOs. The Belgian DPA also is working on a collaboration platform for DPOs (in the context of the European Commission DPO-Connect project).
- Public Authorities: In 2020, the Belgian DPA also focused on various data processing activities of public authorities, as it received and handled numerous complaints on the subject, for example, regarding the use of the National Register of natural persons.
2020 by the Numbers
The press release also highlighted the following figures:
- The number of complaints increased sharply in 2020 with 668 This represents a growth of 290.64% in comparison to the number of complaints filed in 2019. Additionally, the Belgian DPA opened 89 mediation cases and processed 4,123 requests for information.
- The Belgian DPA received 1,097 data breach notifications (in comparison to 877 in 2019) and received 146 requests for opinions.
- The Inspection Service launched 149 investigations in 2020, up from 85 in 2019. Investigations mainly related to direct marketing, COVID-19, the functioning of cities and municipalities, and the use of cameras.
- In 2020, the Belgian DPA’s Litigation Chamber dealt with 533 incoming cases and issued 83 decisions, 34 of these were decisions on the merits. Overall, 78 sanctions were imposed, including 19 fines collectively totaling EUR 885,000.
Read the press release (available in English) and the full Report (available in Dutch and in French).
Search
Recent Posts
Categories
- Behavioral Advertising
- Centre for Information Policy Leadership
- Children’s Privacy
- Cyber Insurance
- Cybersecurity
- Enforcement
- European Union
- Events
- FCRA
- Financial Privacy
- General
- Health Privacy
- Identity Theft
- Information Security
- International
- Marketing
- Multimedia Resources
- Online Privacy
- Security Breach
- U.S. Federal Law
- U.S. State Law
- Workplace Privacy
Tags
- Aaron Simpson
- Accountability
- Adequacy
- Advertisement
- Advertising
- American Privacy Rights Act
- Anna Pateraki
- Anonymization
- Anti-terrorism
- APEC
- Apple Inc.
- Argentina
- Arkansas
- Article 29 Working Party
- Artificial Intelligence
- Australia
- Austria
- Automated Decisionmaking
- Baltimore
- Bankruptcy
- Belgium
- Biden Administration
- Big Data
- Binding Corporate Rules
- Biometric Data
- Blockchain
- Bojana Bellamy
- Brazil
- Brexit
- British Columbia
- Brittany Bacon
- Brussels
- Business Associate Agreement
- BYOD
- California
- CAN-SPAM
- Canada
- Cayman Islands
- CCPA
- CCTV
- Chile
- China
- Chinese Taipei
- Christopher Graham
- CIPA
- Class Action
- Clinical Trial
- Cloud
- Cloud Computing
- CNIL
- Colombia
- Colorado
- Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission
- Compliance
- Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
- Congress
- Connecticut
- Consent
- Consent Order
- Consumer Protection
- Cookies
- COPPA
- Coronavirus/COVID-19
- Council of Europe
- Council of the European Union
- Court of Justice of the European Union
- CPPA
- CPRA
- Credit Monitoring
- Credit Report
- Criminal Law
- Critical Infrastructure
- Croatia
- Cross-Border Data Flow
- Cyber Attack
- Cybersecurity
- Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency
- Data Brokers
- Data Controller
- Data Localization
- Data Privacy Framework
- Data Processor
- Data Protection Act
- Data Protection Authority
- Data Protection Impact Assessment
- Data Transfer
- David Dumont
- David Vladeck
- Delaware
- Denmark
- Department of Commerce
- Department of Health and Human Services
- Department of Homeland Security
- Department of Justice
- Department of the Treasury
- District of Columbia
- Do Not Call
- Do Not Track
- Dobbs
- Dodd-Frank Act
- DPIA
- E-Privacy
- E-Privacy Directive
- Ecuador
- Ed Tech
- Edith Ramirez
- Electronic Communications Privacy Act
- Electronic Privacy Information Center
- Elizabeth Denham
- Employee Monitoring
- Encryption
- ENISA
- EU Data Protection Directive
- EU Member States
- European Commission
- European Data Protection Board
- European Data Protection Supervisor
- European Parliament
- Facial Recognition Technology
- FACTA
- Fair Credit Reporting Act
- Fair Information Practice Principles
- Federal Aviation Administration
- Federal Bureau of Investigation
- Federal Communications Commission
- Federal Data Protection Act
- Federal Trade Commission
- FERC
- FinTech
- Florida
- Food and Drug Administration
- Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act
- France
- Franchise
- Fred Cate
- Freedom of Information Act
- Freedom of Speech
- Fundamental Rights
- GDPR
- Geofencing
- Geolocation
- Georgia
- Germany
- Global Privacy Assembly
- Global Privacy Enforcement Network
- Gramm Leach Bliley Act
- Hacker
- Hawaii
- Health Data
- Health Information
- HIPAA
- HIPPA
- HITECH Act
- Hong Kong
- House of Representatives
- Hungary
- Illinois
- India
- Indiana
- Indonesia
- Information Commissioners Office
- Information Sharing
- Insurance Provider
- Internal Revenue Service
- International Association of Privacy Professionals
- International Commissioners Office
- Internet
- Internet of Things
- IP Address
- Ireland
- Israel
- Italy
- Jacob Kohnstamm
- Japan
- Jason Beach
- Jay Rockefeller
- Jenna Rode
- Jennifer Stoddart
- Jersey
- Jessica Rich
- John Delionado
- John Edwards
- Kentucky
- Korea
- Latin America
- Laura Leonard
- Law Enforcement
- Lawrence Strickling
- Legislation
- Liability
- Lisa Sotto
- Litigation
- Location-Based Services
- London
- Madrid Resolution
- Maine
- Malaysia
- Markus Heyder
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Meta
- Mexico
- Microsoft
- Minnesota
- Mobile App
- Mobile Device
- Montana
- Morocco
- MySpace
- Natascha Gerlach
- National Institute of Standards and Technology
- National Labor Relations Board
- National Science and Technology Council
- National Security
- National Security Agency
- National Telecommunications and Information Administration
- Nebraska
- NEDPA
- Netherlands
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- New Zealand
- Nigeria
- Ninth Circuit
- North Carolina
- Norway
- Obama Administration
- OECD
- Office for Civil Rights
- Office of Foreign Assets Control
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Opt-In Consent
- Oregon
- Outsourcing
- Pakistan
- Parental Consent
- Payment Card
- PCI DSS
- Penalty
- Pennsylvania
- Personal Data
- Personal Health Information
- Personal Information
- Personally Identifiable Information
- Peru
- Philippines
- Phyllis Marcus
- Poland
- PRISM
- Privacy By Design
- Privacy Policy
- Privacy Rights
- Privacy Rule
- Privacy Shield
- Protected Health Information
- Ransomware
- Record Retention
- Red Flags Rule
- Regulation
- Rhode Island
- Richard Thomas
- Right to Be Forgotten
- Right to Privacy
- Risk-Based Approach
- Rosemary Jay
- Russia
- Safe Harbor
- Sanctions
- Schrems
- Scott H. Kimpel
- Scott Kimpel
- Securities and Exchange Commission
- Security Rule
- Senate
- Serbia
- Service Provider
- Singapore
- Smart Grid
- Smart Metering
- Social Media
- Social Security Number
- South Africa
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- South Korea
- Spain
- Spyware
- Standard Contractual Clauses
- State Attorneys General
- Steven Haas
- Stick With Security Series
- Stored Communications Act
- Student Data
- Supreme Court
- Surveillance
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Taiwan
- Targeted Advertising
- Telecommunications
- Telemarketing
- Telephone Consumer Protection Act
- Tennessee
- Terry McAuliffe
- Texas
- Text Message
- Thailand
- Transparency
- Transportation Security Administration
- Trump Administration
- United Arab Emirates
- United Kingdom
- United States
- Unmanned Aircraft Systems
- Uruguay
- Utah
- Vermont
- Video Privacy Protection Act
- Video Surveillance
- Virginia
- Viviane Reding
- Washington
- Whistleblowing
- Wireless Network
- Wiretap
- ZIP Code