On January 10, 2018, the Law of 3 December 2017 creating the Data Protection Authority (the “Law”) was published in the Belgian Official Gazette. The Law was submitted in the Chamber of Representatives on August 23, 2017, and was approved by the Parliament in plenary meeting on November 16, 2017.
The EU General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) provides national data protection authorities with a strengthened enforcement role. In this context, the Belgian legislator adopted the Law reforming the Belgian Privacy Commission, established by the Law of 8 December 1992 implementing Directive 95/46/EC. It replaces the Belgian Privacy Commission with the Belgian Data Protection Authority (“DPA”) (Autorité de protection des données in French and Gegevensbeschermingsautoriteit in Dutch).
The main purpose of the Law is to ensure that the DPA can fulfill its tasks under the GDPR, since the current Belgian Privacy Commission has limited prosecutorial powers and no direct sanctioning powers.
Different Composition
In particular, the Law changes the structure and composition of the current Belgian Privacy Commission and replaces the existing sector committees with six new ones:
- An Executive Committee that, amongst others, approves the DPA’s annual budget and strategy and management plan, and follows the technical developments that have an impact on data protection.
- A General Secretariat responsible for the daily operations of the DPA, including (1) following the social, economic and technological developments that have an impact on data protection; (2) establishing the list of processing activities that require a data protection impact assessment; (3) providing an opinion on prior consultation by a data controller; (4) approving codes of conduct and certification criteria; and (5) approving standard contractual clauses and binding corporate rules.
- A First Line Service responsible for receiving complaints and requests made to the DPA; starting mediation procedures; raising awareness around data protection and, in particular amongst minors, providing individuals with information regarding their data protection rights; and raising awareness of data controllers and processors regarding their obligations under the GDPR.
- A Knowledge Centre responsible for providing advice, upon request or on its own initiative, on questions related to data processing and recommendations regarding social, economic or technological developments.
- An Investigation Service responsible for the investigations.
- A Litigation Chamber that deals with administrative proceedings.
- A Reflection Board responsible for providing non-binding advice, upon request of the Executive Committee or the Knowledge Centre or on its own initiative, on all data protection-related subjects.
National and International Cooperation
The Law also provides that the DPA will have to cooperate with national and international actors. More specifically, the DPA will have to cooperate with all other Belgian public and private actors involved in the protection of the rights and freedoms of individuals, particularly regarding the free flow of personal data and customer protection. The DPA will also have to cooperate with other national data protection authorities. Such cooperation will focus on, inter alia, the creation of centers of expertise, the exchange of information, mutual assistance for controlling measures, and the sharing of human and financial resources.
Enforcement and Investigation Powers
The DPA will have investigation and control powers, as well as various enforcement powers, including the power to (1) drop a case without action; (2) dismiss a case; (3) order that the sentence be suspended; (4) propose a transaction; (5) issue a warning; (6) order compliance with individuals’ requests; (7) inform individuals of a security incident; (8) order that the processing be frozen, limited or temporarily or permanently prohibited; (9) order the rectification or deletion of personal data and the notification thereof to individuals; (10) order the license of a certification organism be withdrawn; (11) suspend data transfers; (12) impose daily fines and administrative fines; (13) transmit a file to the Public Prosecutor; and (14) publish the decisions taken on its website.
The investigation powers of the DPA will also broaden and will include the power to (1) hear witnesses; (2) identify individuals; (3) conduct a written inquiry; (4) conduct on-site reviews; (5) access computer systems and copy all data such systems may contain; (6) access information electronically; (7) seize or seal goods or computer systems; and (8) request the identification of the subscriber or regular user of an electronic communication service or electronic communication means used. In addition, the Investigation Service will be able to take interim measures, including suspending, limiting or freezing data processing activities.
The Law also sets out the procedure to be followed in case of a claim or any other request from a natural or legal person with respect to personal data protection.
Search
Recent Posts
Categories
- Behavioral Advertising
- Centre for Information Policy Leadership
- Children’s Privacy
- Cyber Insurance
- Cybersecurity
- Enforcement
- European Union
- Events
- FCRA
- Financial Privacy
- General
- Health Privacy
- Identity Theft
- Information Security
- International
- Marketing
- Multimedia Resources
- Online Privacy
- Security Breach
- U.S. Federal Law
- U.S. State Law
- Workplace Privacy
Tags
- Aaron Simpson
- Accountability
- Adequacy
- Advertisement
- Advertising
- American Privacy Rights Act
- Anna Pateraki
- Anonymization
- Anti-terrorism
- APEC
- Apple Inc.
- Argentina
- Arkansas
- Article 29 Working Party
- Artificial Intelligence
- Australia
- Austria
- Automated Decisionmaking
- Baltimore
- Bankruptcy
- Belgium
- Biden Administration
- Big Data
- Binding Corporate Rules
- Biometric Data
- Blockchain
- Bojana Bellamy
- Brazil
- Brexit
- British Columbia
- Brittany Bacon
- Brussels
- Business Associate Agreement
- BYOD
- California
- CAN-SPAM
- Canada
- Cayman Islands
- CCPA
- CCTV
- Chile
- China
- Chinese Taipei
- Christopher Graham
- CIPA
- Class Action
- Clinical Trial
- Cloud
- Cloud Computing
- CNIL
- Colombia
- Colorado
- Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission
- Compliance
- Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
- Congress
- Connecticut
- Consent
- Consent Order
- Consumer Protection
- Cookies
- COPPA
- Coronavirus/COVID-19
- Council of Europe
- Council of the European Union
- Court of Justice of the European Union
- CPPA
- CPRA
- Credit Monitoring
- Credit Report
- Criminal Law
- Critical Infrastructure
- Croatia
- Cross-Border Data Flow
- Cyber Attack
- Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency
- Data Brokers
- Data Controller
- Data Localization
- Data Privacy Framework
- Data Processor
- Data Protection Act
- Data Protection Authority
- Data Protection Impact Assessment
- Data Transfer
- David Dumont
- David Vladeck
- Delaware
- Denmark
- Department of Commerce
- Department of Health and Human Services
- Department of Homeland Security
- Department of Justice
- Department of the Treasury
- District of Columbia
- Do Not Call
- Do Not Track
- Dobbs
- Dodd-Frank Act
- DPIA
- E-Privacy
- E-Privacy Directive
- Ecuador
- Ed Tech
- Edith Ramirez
- Electronic Communications Privacy Act
- Electronic Privacy Information Center
- Elizabeth Denham
- Employee Monitoring
- Encryption
- ENISA
- EU Data Protection Directive
- EU Member States
- European Commission
- European Data Protection Board
- European Data Protection Supervisor
- European Parliament
- Facial Recognition Technology
- FACTA
- Fair Credit Reporting Act
- Fair Information Practice Principles
- Federal Aviation Administration
- Federal Bureau of Investigation
- Federal Communications Commission
- Federal Data Protection Act
- Federal Trade Commission
- FERC
- FinTech
- Florida
- Food and Drug Administration
- Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act
- France
- Franchise
- Fred Cate
- Freedom of Information Act
- Freedom of Speech
- Fundamental Rights
- GDPR
- Geofencing
- Geolocation
- Georgia
- Germany
- Global Privacy Assembly
- Global Privacy Enforcement Network
- Gramm Leach Bliley Act
- Hacker
- Hawaii
- Health Data
- Health Information
- HIPAA
- HIPPA
- HITECH Act
- Hong Kong
- House of Representatives
- Hungary
- Illinois
- India
- Indiana
- Indonesia
- Information Commissioners Office
- Information Sharing
- Insurance Provider
- Internal Revenue Service
- International Association of Privacy Professionals
- International Commissioners Office
- Internet
- Internet of Things
- IP Address
- Ireland
- Israel
- Italy
- Jacob Kohnstamm
- Japan
- Jason Beach
- Jay Rockefeller
- Jenna Rode
- Jennifer Stoddart
- Jersey
- Jessica Rich
- John Delionado
- John Edwards
- Kentucky
- Korea
- Latin America
- Laura Leonard
- Law Enforcement
- Lawrence Strickling
- Legislation
- Liability
- Lisa Sotto
- Litigation
- Location-Based Services
- London
- Madrid Resolution
- Maine
- Malaysia
- Markus Heyder
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Meta
- Mexico
- Microsoft
- Minnesota
- Mobile App
- Mobile Device
- Montana
- Morocco
- MySpace
- Natascha Gerlach
- National Institute of Standards and Technology
- National Labor Relations Board
- National Science and Technology Council
- National Security
- National Security Agency
- National Telecommunications and Information Administration
- Nebraska
- NEDPA
- Netherlands
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- New Zealand
- Nigeria
- Ninth Circuit
- North Carolina
- Norway
- Obama Administration
- OECD
- Office for Civil Rights
- Office of Foreign Assets Control
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Opt-In Consent
- Oregon
- Outsourcing
- Pakistan
- Parental Consent
- Payment Card
- PCI DSS
- Penalty
- Pennsylvania
- Personal Data
- Personal Health Information
- Personal Information
- Personally Identifiable Information
- Peru
- Philippines
- Phyllis Marcus
- Poland
- PRISM
- Privacy By Design
- Privacy Policy
- Privacy Rights
- Privacy Rule
- Privacy Shield
- Protected Health Information
- Ransomware
- Record Retention
- Red Flags Rule
- Regulation
- Rhode Island
- Richard Thomas
- Right to Be Forgotten
- Right to Privacy
- Risk-Based Approach
- Rosemary Jay
- Russia
- Safe Harbor
- Sanctions
- Schrems
- Scott Kimpel
- Securities and Exchange Commission
- Security Rule
- Senate
- Serbia
- Service Provider
- Singapore
- Smart Grid
- Smart Metering
- Social Media
- Social Security Number
- South Africa
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- South Korea
- Spain
- Spyware
- Standard Contractual Clauses
- State Attorneys General
- Steven Haas
- Stick With Security Series
- Stored Communications Act
- Student Data
- Supreme Court
- Surveillance
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- Taiwan
- Targeted Advertising
- Telecommunications
- Telemarketing
- Telephone Consumer Protection Act
- Tennessee
- Terry McAuliffe
- Texas
- Text Message
- Thailand
- Transparency
- Transportation Security Administration
- Trump Administration
- United Arab Emirates
- United Kingdom
- United States
- Unmanned Aircraft Systems
- Uruguay
- Utah
- Vermont
- Video Privacy Protection Act
- Video Surveillance
- Virginia
- Viviane Reding
- Washington
- Whistleblowing
- Wireless Network
- Wiretap
- ZIP Code